Current:Home > ScamsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -ChatGPT
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-19 23:10:50
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (7548)
Related
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Univision cozies up to Trump, proving the Latino vote is very much in play in 2024
- What is the healthiest chocolate? How milk, dark and white stack up.
- Driving or flying before feasting? Here are some tips for Thanksgiving travelers
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Congo’s presidential candidates kick off campaigning a month before election
- Inside Former President Jimmy Carter and Wife Rosalynn Carter's 8-Decade Love Story
- Jason Momoa makes waves as 'SNL' host, tells Dasani to 'suck it' during opening monologue
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Chargers coach Brandon Staley gets heated in postgame exchange after loss to Packers
Ranking
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- How Patrick Mahomes Really Feels About Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift's Romance
- Pope Francis: Climate Activist?
- Seoul warns North Korea not to launch a spy satellite and hints a 2018 peace deal could be suspended
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- A timeline of key moments from former first lady Rosalynn Carter’s 96 years
- Najee Harris 'tired' of Steelers' poor performances in 2023 season after loss to Browns
- Weeklong negotiations for landmark treaty to end plastic pollution close, marred in disagreements
Recommendation
Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
Did police refuse to investigate a serial rapist? Inside the case rocking a Tennessee city
Sharon Osbourne says she 'lost 42 pounds' since Ozempic, can't gain weight: 'I'm too gaunt'
George Brown, drummer and co-founder of Kool & The Gang, dead at 74
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Chargers coach Brandon Staley gets heated in postgame exchange after loss to Packers
Severe storms delay search for 12 crew missing after Turkish cargo ship sinks in Black Sea
Dissent over US policy in the Israel-Hamas war stirs unusual public protests from federal employees